Accessibility
A statement is only worth reading if it says what is wrong as well as what is right. This one does.
What we aim at
WCAG 2.2 at level AA. That is the standard most jurisdictions reference, and it is the one we test against rather than a vaguer promise to try.
What is in place
Contrast on this site is calculated rather than eyeballed. Body text is measured against the worst backdrop it can land on — not an average — and clears 4.5:1 with margin; the headline treatment on the landing page measures 11.9:1 against the brightest mark the background can produce.
- Every page works from the keyboard, and focus is always visible.
- Interactive targets are at least 44 by 44 pixels.
- `prefers-reduced-motion` is honoured everywhere, including the animated background, which paints one frame and stops rather than disappearing.
- The site works at 200% zoom and reflows to a phone without a horizontal scrollbar.
- Nothing on the site asks you to scroll in two directions. The studio artifacts are wider than a phone, so they are scaled to fit rather than put in a sideways-scrolling window inside a page that already scrolls down.
- Arabic pages are genuinely right-to-left, not a mirrored afterthought.
What is not right yet
The interface studies in the studio are hidden from screen readers and replaced by a written description of each, because they are pictures that respond to a cursor rather than working controls. A description is not the same as access to the thing, and we know it.
The site has not been tested with a screen reader by someone who uses one daily. Automated checks and manual keyboard testing are not a substitute for that, and we would rather say so than imply a review that has not happened.
The Arabic has not been reviewed by a native speaker.
If something blocks you
Tell us, at the address on the contact page, and say what you were trying to do. We will fix it and reply to you when it is fixed. If you need something on this site in another format, ask and we will send it.
Last updated 2026-08-19.